In today’s polarized political environment, it is hard to envision that happening for anything remotely controversial. Passage of a new constitutional amendment would change it – and that would require a two-thirds “aye” vote in both House and Senate, plus the approval of the legislatures of three-quarters of the 50 states. Congress can’t pass legislation changing it. The president can’t change that by executive order. “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside,” runs the language. The problem here is that, unpopular or not, birthright citizenship is rooted in the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. A Rasmussen poll from 2011 found that it was opposed by 61 percent of respondents. Nor is birthright citizenship under such circumstances popular, argue Trump and other anti-immigration activists. “This remains the biggest magnet for illegal immigration,” the Trump paper says. Paul Pelosi attack highlights soaring threats of political violence One of the biggest things his new immigration plan calls for is the elimination of birthright citizenship – the policy whereby every child born on US soil becomes a US citizen. When candidates bring them up or promote Constitution-level change, they’re generally advertising their values, as opposed to talking about stuff that might occur in the real world. Constitutional amendments are a dead parrot. The key point for voters to remember is this: That’s not happening. Sometimes they admit this, sometimes they don’t. Most of the other presidential hopefuls, both Republican and Democratic, are pushing policies that would require constitutional amendments. “America will only be great as long as America remains a nation of laws that lives according to the Constitution,” the plan reads.īut what the proposal doesn’t say is that its full implementation would require changing the Constitution, a process that’s pretty much impossible given the current nature of the US political divide. Trump frames this plan as a defense of the nation’s existing legal order. Among other things, it proposes forcing Mexico to pay for a new border wall and tripling the number of agents patrolling the southern border of the United States. Donald Trump released a sweeping, point-by-point anti-immigration plan on Sunday.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |